“Micky Mouse Creativity: New Media Arts after the Ideology of Creativity.” Conference on “Creative Labor and the Humanities,” Florida State University, Tallahassee. 22 March 2013.
March 2013
Monthly Archive
| 2013 |
“Mickey Mouse Creativity: New Media Arts after the Ideology of Creativity” (Florida State U.)Categories Talks
|
| 2013 |
“Is Digital Humanities a Field? — An Answer From the Point of View of Language”Categories Blog Essays
|
Citation: “Is Digital Humanities a Field? — An Answer From the Point of View of Language.” Alan Liu, 6 March 2013. https://liu.english.ucsb.edu/is-digital-humanities-a-field-an-answer-from-the-point-of-view-of-language/
Excerpt
Over the past few years, I have wrestled with a low-level set of usage and style problems when publishing essays related to digital-humanities issues. These may be put in the form of the two questions: is “digital humanities” singular or plural? and should we crown the phrase with the definite article (“the digital humanities”)?
Of course, these are prosaic questions. But the issues they represent have the unsettling habit of showing up in the most prominent places, such as in the title of an essay I have forthcoming in The Changing Profession section of PMLA. Where my manuscript originally read, “The Meaning of Digital Humanities,” my copy editor has revised to,”The Meaning of the Digital Humanities.” Nor is it just in prominent places that the issues appear. Usage problems of this sort are pervasive to the point that my manuscripts on [the] digital humanities tend to be sprinkled throughout with innumerable tiny problems at the low level of articles and subject-verb agreements. . . .
